{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "TechArticle", "headline": "How to Choose the Right Data Historian", "description": "A practical guide to choosing the right industrial data historian, including performance, architecture, cost, scalability, and modern manufacturing requirements.", "image": "https://timebase.flow-software.com/images/choose-the-right-data-historian.jpg", "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Flow Software Engineering Team", "url": "https://flow-software.com" }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Flow Software Inc.", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://flow-software.com/images/logo.png" } }, "datePublished": "2026-01-31", "dateModified": "2026-01-31", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://timebase.flow-software.com/choose-the-right-data-historian" } }
For decades, industrial data historians have been the backbone of manufacturing operations, collecting and storing time-series data from sensors, control systems, and industrial equipment. These systems have provided invaluable insights into process performance, efficiency, and maintenance. However, the shift towards Industry 4.0—characterized by digital transformation, cloud computing, and AI-driven analytics—is challenging the traditional historian business model. Many manufacturers are now reevaluating their approach, seeking solutions that align with their new data strategies.
Legacy data historians have historically been proprietary, expensive, and locked behind restrictive licensing models. These systems were designed in an era when industrial data rarely left the plant floor, and analytics meant generating standard process reports. Today, manufacturers need real-time access to historical data across multiple systems, integrating with cloud services, AI, and enterprise analytics platforms. Unfortunately, most legacy historians, paired to legacy business models, have created road blocks to this task, sometimes becoming unbearable.
High Licensing Costs: Perpetual and tag-based licensing models restrict flexibility and scale and force engineering to be selective over what data they historizie or justify an ROI which gets in the way of experimentation and innovation.
Vendor Lock-in: Proprietary formats and a lack of open, accessible APIs make it difficult to integrate data with modern tools. Some legacy historians are fully locked, only allowing the manufacturers data to be used by their tools.
Limited Scalability: Expanding historian capabilities often requires costly add-ons or hardware upgrades. An example of this is when a simple REST API requires licensing.
Slow Access to Data: Traditional historians were not designed for the needs of cloud-based AI and machine learning workflows. Often legacy solutions require manual CSV export and most historians lack the ability to apply context or models.
As manufacturers push for greater agility and interoperability, new business models are disrupting the historian market. Open and free-to-use solutions are emerging, allowing organizations to leverage modern technology stacks without prohibitive licensing costs. Timebase is leading this shift by offering a completely free data historian, eliminating the traditional constraints that have held manufacturers back. With an open architecture, flexible data access, and no tag-based licensing, Timebase enables manufacturers with a high performance data historian and all the supporting tools manufacturing operations need to ensure their success.
The new generation of manufacturers understands that data is their most valuable asset. They are moving toward historian solutions that empower them to:
Reduce operational costs by avoiding high software fees and tag licensing completely. Paying per tag is a model established in the 90s and is ready to be disrupted.
Break down data silos and create unified analytics environments. Architecture decisions that are scalable and reusable have become the new standard.
Scale seamlessly as their operations grow without restrictive licensing models or performance limitations. Read and write speeds must not be the bottleneck on what you can store or where you can share the data.
Future-proof their infrastructure by ensuring compatibility with modern cloud and AI technologies. Unless you can easily bolt-on AI agents and workflows you are building ontop of technical debt that is not sustainable.
With the increasing demand for real-time analytics, cloud-based solutions, and cost-effective data management, the time has come for manufacturers to rethink their approach to data historians. The old models of expensive, locked-down systems are no longer sustainable in an Industry 4.0 world. Timebase offers a forward-thinking alternative, enabling manufacturers to take control of their industrial data without the barriers of traditional historians. If you're looking for a modern, scalable, and cost-effective way to store and access your industrial time-series data, it's time to explore what Timebase can do for you.
Learn more about how Timebase is transforming industrial data management by trying to for yourself.